Blockchain & Digital Assets Weekly Briefing - Week 21
- 3 days ago
- 19 min read
Week ending 22nd May 2026
This week in the digital assets space: the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission moves toward tokenized stock trading and easier public listings for crypto firms, Iran deploys Bitcoin-settled maritime insurance, the United States expands Federal Reserve access to fintechs, and Morgan Stanley files for a spot Solana staking ETF.
The SEC is preparing to let crypto platforms trade tokenized versions of any stock — without the company's permission.
Iran deploys bitcoin-settled maritime insurance at the world's most critical oil chokepoint.
The U.S. just moved to let non-bank fintechs plug into the Federal Reserve's payment system.
The SEC just rewrote the rules for going public — and crypto companies are first in line to benefit.
Morgan Stanley becomes first major U.S. bank to file spot Solana staking ETF.
The SEC is preparing to let crypto platforms trade tokenized versions of any stock — without the company's permission
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) — the federal regulator overseeing America's roughly $50 trillion equity markets — is on the verge of releasing what it calls an "innovation exemption" for tokenized stocks. The move, first reported by Bloomberg on May 18, would represent one of the most consequential shifts in U.S. market structure in years, and it comes with a twist that few expected: platforms may be allowed to tokenize shares of public companies like Apple or Amazon without those companies ever agreeing to it.
What is actually being proposed?
Tokenization, in plain terms, means creating a digital version of a real-world asset — a stock, a bond, a piece of real estate — on a blockchain. Instead of your broker holding a record of your Apple shares, a token on a crypto network does. Supporters argue the technology enables faster settlement, fractional ownership, lower transaction costs, and around-the-clock trading — the U.S. stock market currently operates only on weekdays during business hours.
The innovation exemption would create a new regulatory path for trading tokens linked to publicly traded companies, and could let crypto-native platforms offer those products under lighter regulatory requirements — potentially without needing a full broker-dealer or exchange licence in certain cases.
The bigger surprise is the scope. The SEC is leaning toward allowing the trading of tokens that do not have the backing or consent of the public companies whose shares they track. These "third-party" tokens — effectively a novel way to speculate on the direction of a share price — would be tradeable on decentralised crypto platforms, though not all such instruments necessarily carry the same benefits as normal stocks, such as voting rights or dividends.
Who is behind this, and what is the timeline?
The framework has been developed under SEC Chair Paul Atkins' "Project Crypto" initiative, and would create an experimental period during which approved platforms could list tokenised equities without full broker-dealer registration. Atkins, a longtime crypto advocate, took over the SEC in early 2025, promising what he called a "new day" at the agency.
On April 21, 2026, speaking at the Economic Club of Washington on the first anniversary of his tenure, Atkins announced that the Commission was "on the verge of releasing" the Innovation Exemption — a framework that would, for the first time, allow market participants to trade tokenised securities on-chain in a formally compliant manner.
The push has not been unanimous inside the agency. The drive for the exemption largely came from Commissioner Hester Peirce, a long-time ally of Atkins. Some SEC officials do not support the decision to allow the trading of third-party tokenised securities.
Wall Street is already moving
The traditional financial industry has not waited for the SEC to act. The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) — which processes and safeguards the vast majority of U.S. securities transactions — has said it plans to begin limited production trades of tokenised assets in July, ahead of a broader launch in October.
Earlier this month, Bullish, the crypto exchange run by former NYSE President Tom Farley, acquired transfer agent Equiniti in a $4.2 billion deal. Transfer agents are the record keepers of stock exchanges, tracking share ownership and facilitating dividend payments. Meanwhile, NYSE plans to introduce rules allowing tokenised equities and ETFs to be traded and settled on the blockchain 24 hours a day, while Nasdaq is developing a share issuance platform based on blockchain that preserves traditional ownership rights.
The concerns are real and loud
Not everyone is enthusiastic. The central worry is market fragmentation — the idea that if multiple platforms can issue their own token versions of the same stock, investors may end up holding products with different prices, different rights, and different levels of protection, all supposedly tracking the same underlying share.
Brett Redfearn, president of tokenisation firm Securitize and a former director of the SEC's trading and markets division, put it plainly:
"If third parties can tokenize Apple or Amazon without the issuer at the table, there's no theoretical limit on how many wrappers of the same company exist at once. This could create a whole new level of market fragmentation and could leave investors less certain what their shares are actually worth at any moment."
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) warned in December that the potential absence of standard requirements such as market interconnectivity and price transparency could cause markets to "fragment and become disorderly". Citadel Securities, one of the world's largest market makers, also pushed back, arguing in December that any exemption should not override core market safeguards including know-your-customer and anti-money laundering protections.
Security is another live issue: several DeFi platforms have been targeted by hacks this year, draining hundreds of millions of dollars and underscoring the vulnerabilities of the infrastructure on which these tokens would trade.
The legal guardrails (for now)
The exemption is not a free-for-all. Officials plan to include specific guardrails such as exposure limits, disclosure requirements, and conditions tied to the programme's temporary nature. Crucially, the SEC's January 2026 guidance made clear that tokenising a security does not change its legal classification — federal securities laws apply based on the economic substance of the instrument, not its form. In other words, a tokenised Apple share is still a security and subject to the same rules — the exemption would ease certain registration requirements for platforms during the pilot period, not eliminate the underlying legal obligations.
Under the SEC's proposal, platforms that fail to provide the standard benefits of stock ownership — such as voting rights and dividends — would lose the right to list the tokens.
Peirce herself urged caution in February:
"It would be an important step toward facilitating the integration of tokenised securities into our existing financial system, but it would not change the entire financial system overnight".
Why it matters
This is not just a crypto story. If the exemption lands as expected, it will be the first time the U.S. has formally opened a regulated pathway for stock-like instruments to trade outside the established exchange and broker-dealer infrastructure — on blockchains, through automated protocols, potentially around the clock. Whether that leads to a more efficient market or a more fragmented and harder-to-regulate one is the central question this experiment is designed to answer.
The SEC's decision to allow third-party tokenisation without issuer consent is the detail that matters most. It is also the one where, even inside the regulator itself, the debate is far from over.
Iran deploys bitcoin-settled maritime insurance at the world's most critical oil chokepoint
Iran's Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance has reportedly launched a state-backed digital maritime insurance platform called Hormuz Safe, targeting shipping companies and cargo owners transiting the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf. All premiums and policy settlements are payable in Bitcoin — no Western bank required. The link, it appears, is not available outside of Iran.
What is the Strait of Hormuz — and why does it matter?
Before diving into the platform itself, the geography is essential context. Roughly a fifth of the world's daily oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz — a narrow channel between Iran and Oman. Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan imported almost two-thirds of their total LNG supplies via the Strait of Hormuz in 2025, making them particularly vulnerable to any potential disruption. Every tanker navigating that corridor requires marine insurance — and until now, that insurance has been underwritten almost exclusively through Western financial institutions.
What is Hormuz Safe?
The platform is backed by Iran's Ministry of Economy and Financial Affairs and was first reported by the IRGC-affiliated Fars News Agency, which cited internal government documents.
The system works entirely online: ship operators or cargo owners select a policy, pay premiums using Bitcoin or other crypto assets, and receive digital proof of coverage once the blockchain transaction is confirmed. The platform also issues cryptographically verifiable insurance certificates, and is designed to assist vessels in escaping risks such as detention, inspection, or confiscation while operating in the region.
In short: Iran is offering what it frames as sovereign-backed protection for vessels crossing its most strategically sensitive waters — in exchange for Bitcoin.
The financial logic: bypassing SWIFT
Iran has been under sweeping Western sanctions for decades, cutting it off from the SWIFT interbank network that underpins virtually all international insurance and trade finance. Hormuz Safe, backed by Iran's Ministry of Economy, uses Bitcoin and crypto to settle policies directly — no SWIFT network required, no Western intermediaries needed.
This is not an isolated move. In April, Hamid Hosseini, spokesperson for Iran's Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Products Exporters' Union, told the Financial Times that tanker transit fees could be settled in Bitcoin or other non-dollar currencies, including yuan, with charges potentially reaching up to $2 million per vessel depending on cargo volume.
Iran's crypto infrastructure is also substantial: Iran legalized industrial Bitcoin mining in 2019 and at its peak ran as much as 4.2% of global hashrate. Iran's crypto ecosystem reached an estimated $7.8 billion in 2025, with IRGC-linked transactions accounting for roughly 50% of the country's total crypto volume by Q4 of that year.
The revenue ambition
Iran claims the program could generate more than $10 billion in revenue, though Fars provided no timeframe or breakdown, and no independent source has verified that the platform has processed any actual policies.
The risks for shipping companies
The platform's potential appeal to operators in sanctioned or sanction-adjacent economies is real — but so are the legal hazards for everyone else. Operators considering the platform face significant legal exposure under U.S. secondary sanctions.
There is also a fraud dimension. Greek maritime risk firm MARISKS has warned shipping companies of scammers posing as Iranian authorities and demanding Bitcoin or USDT for safe passage. Whether Hormuz Safe is an entirely distinct, legitimate state initiative or overlaps with such schemes remains publicly unverified.
The bigger picture
Hormuz Safe is the latest — and most structured — expression of Iran's effort to monetise its geographic leverage over global energy flows through crypto rails. Whether it gains operational traction depends on one key question: whether the platform gains formal international recognition, and whether the risk of U.S. secondary sanctions deters cargo operators from using it.
For the digital assets space, the significance is harder to ignore. A nation-state is now using Bitcoin not just to store value or evade sanctions quietly — but as the settlement layer for a publicly announced financial product tied directly to one of the world's most contested strategic corridors.
The U.S. just moved to let non-bank fintechs plug into the Federal Reserve's payment system
On May 19, 2026, President Donald Trump signed a new Executive Order directing federal financial regulators to overhaul the rules governing how fintech companies access and integrate with the traditional U.S. financial system. The move is the latest in a series of digital asset and financial technology actions taken by the Trump administration since returning to office in January 2025.
What the Order does
At its core, the Executive Order directs federal financial regulators to review existing regulations, guidance, supervisory practices, and application processes to identify those that could be updated to facilitate innovation and greater competition in the provision of financial services, while maintaining safety and soundness.
In plain terms: regulators are being asked to audit their own rulebooks and flag anything that creates unnecessary friction for fintech companies — those offering digital banking, payments, brokerage, custody, and securities services — while keeping risk controls in place.
The Federal Reserve gets a specific task
A notable element of the Order is a direct assignment to the Federal Reserve. The Order asks the Federal Reserve to evaluate the legal, regulatory, and policy frameworks governing access to Reserve Bank payment accounts and payment services by uninsured depository institutions and non-bank financial companies.
Currently, access to the Fed's payment infrastructure — the backbone of the U.S. dollar system — is largely restricted to chartered, insured banks. The Order asks the Fed to report on options for expanding such access, subject to appropriate risk management requirements, as well as legal impediments that preclude direct access, along with legislative or regulatory options that could enable such access while mitigating risks.
What it would actually mean
If non-bank fintechs and crypto firms were eventually granted direct access to Federal Reserve payment accounts, the consequences would be far-reaching. Today, companies like Coinbase, Stripe, or Chime must route transactions through a licensed, insured bank — paying fees and operating within that bank's compliance framework. Direct Fed access would cut out that intermediary, potentially lowering transaction costs, accelerating settlement times, and giving fintech firms the same foundational financial plumbing that traditional banks have enjoyed for decades. For the digital asset industry specifically, it would represent a form of institutional legitimacy that has long been sought but never granted: a crypto-native or fintech-native firm sitting directly on the U.S. dollar payment rails, without a bank as gatekeeper. The flip side is equally significant — regulators, consumer protection advocates, and traditional banks would likely push back hard, raising questions about deposit insurance, systemic risk, and the supervision of entities that do not carry the same obligations as chartered banks.
The administration's argument: old rules protect incumbents
The White House fact sheet frames existing regulations as structurally biased in favour of established financial institutions. Rules governing access to various payment services and resource-intensive requirements related to financial institutions' third-party risk management favour incumbents at the expense of innovators.
The administration adds that other financial regulations, guidance, and policies are relics of a time when financial services were predominantly provided in brick-and-mortar-centric settings and must be updated to reflect the modern age, the digital economy, and the benefits that technology can offer to all Americans, including lowering costs of financial services.
Broader context: part of a pattern
This Order does not exist in isolation. It is the latest in a string of digital finance actions from the Trump White House:
In his first week in office, President Trump signed an Executive Order to drive innovation and economic opportunity by securing the United States' position as the world's leader in the digital asset economy and establishing regulatory clarity for digital financial technology.
In March 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile, positioning the U.S. as a world leader in government digital asset strategy.
In March 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order to modernise how the government handles money, switching from paper-based payments to fast and secure electronic payments.
In December 2025, President Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum to ensure America's leadership in 6G development and global competitiveness in cutting-edge technologies.
What to watch
The Order sets a review-and-report process in motion rather than implementing immediate rule changes. The critical next steps will be: how quickly regulators complete their reviews, what the Federal Reserve concludes about Fed account access for non-bank fintechs, and whether Congress acts on any legislative recommendations that emerge.
Critics of deregulatory approaches to fintech may raise concerns around consumer protection, systemic risk, and the supervision of non-bank actors — none of which are addressed in the White House fact sheet. Those perspectives will likely surface in the regulatory comment and review process that follows.
For the digital asset industry, however, the direction of travel is clear: the Trump administration is pushing to embed crypto and fintech infrastructure into the core of the U.S. financial system.
The SEC just rewrote the rules for going public — and crypto companies are first in line to benefit
The biggest overhaul of U.S. public offering rules in over 20 years removes the gatekeeping thresholds that have kept mid-sized digital asset companies out of public markets — or made listing prohibitively expensive.
A wave of crypto IPOs, and a costly barrier at the door
The U.S. digital asset industry has been on a public listing tear. In 2025, at least 11 crypto companies went public, raising a combined $14.6 billion — a dramatic jump from just $310 million in 2024. Firms like Circle (CRCL), Bullish (BLSH), and Gemini completed major U.S. market debuts, riding a more accommodating regulatory environment under SEC Chairman Paul Atkins.
But 2026 has been bumpier. Crypto custodian BitGo is the only digital asset company to have listed so far this year, and its stock has dropped 40% since its debut, partly reflecting volatile market conditions. Securitize, the tokenisation specialist backed by BlackRock, says it still intends to go public and is awaiting SEC regulatory clearance, which it expects in Q2 2026.
Against that backdrop, the SEC on May 19, 2026 proposed the most sweeping overhaul of public offering rules in more than two decades — and the crypto industry sits squarely in its crosshairs.
What happened 20 years ago — and why it still matters
The last time the SEC made substantial changes to the registered offering framework was in 2005, as part of what it called the "Securities Act Offering Reform" rulemaking. That reform, which took effect on December 1, 2005, streamlined the shelf registration process and created the category of "well-known seasoned issuers" (WKSIs) — large companies eligible for automatic shelf registration and the most flexible communication rules.
That WKSI framework became the gatekeeping architecture that governed public capital raising for the next two decades. Most of today's crypto companies — mid-sized, fast-growing, but not yet meeting the rigid size thresholds — simply could not access its benefits. The 2026 proposals are designed to change exactly that. Since 2005, smartphones, cloud computing, social media, structured data, and third-party messaging have transformed the investment ecosystem entirely — and the SEC's rulebook is only now catching up.
The broader problem the SEC is trying to solve: the number of listed firms in the U.S. has declined by roughly 40% since the mid-1990s, as compounding regulatory costs pushed companies — including digital asset firms — toward staying private or listing overseas.
Proposal 1: registered offering reform — faster, cheaper capital raising
This first proposal would be, if adopted, the most significant modernisation of the registered offering framework in more than 20 years.
The key instrument here is Form S-3 — the short-form registration statement that allows companies to conduct "shelf offerings", essentially pre-registering securities so they can be sold quickly when market conditions are favourable. Currently, access to Form S-3 is gated behind a requirement to have been a public reporting company for at least 12 months and to carry a public float of at least $75 million for unlimited securities issuance.
Under the proposal, both the 12-month seasoning requirement and the $75 million public float threshold would be eliminated. The SEC estimates this could result in an increase of over 60% in the number of issuers eligible to offer an unlimited amount of securities on Form S-3.
What's a public float? Public float is the part of a company’s shares that is actually available for regular people to trade on the stock market. Simple breakdown: A company’s total shares can be split into two groups:
|
"Well-Known Seasoned Issuer" (WKSI) status — democratised
Currently, the most valuable regulatory privileges — including the ability to use automatic shelf registration statements and conduct more flexible investor communications — are reserved for so-called WKSIs. To qualify as a WKSI today, an issuer must have at least $700 million in public float or have issued at least $1 billion of debt securities in registered offerings.
Under the proposed rules, issuers would no longer be required to meet either of those metrics. Instead, they would qualify for most of those enhanced benefits if they are eligible to use Form S-3 and have at least one class of common equity listed on a national securities exchange. The SEC projects this could produce an increase of over 200% in the number of issuers eligible for all of the enhanced registration and communication benefits.
State-by-state compliance, eliminated
One of the most practically burdensome aspects of raising capital across the U.S. has been the patchwork of individual state securities laws — so-called "Blue Sky" laws. State securities law registration and qualification requirements would be preempted for all registered offerings under the proposal, mitigating the costs and complexity of conducting multi-state registered offerings. Currently, this preemption (when federal rules override state rules) only applies when securities are listed on a national exchange (like the NYSE or Nasdaq); unlisted securities remain exposed to state-by-state compliance costs.
“Going public” ≠ “being listed on an exchange” A company can be public without being listed on a major stock exchange. These are two related but different concepts:
In short:
|
Form S-1 modernisation
For companies filing on Form S-1 — the standard IPO registration form — the proposal expands the ability to incorporate previously filed information by reference rather than re-filing it in full. The SEC estimates an increase of up to 106% in the number of issuers eligible to "forward incorporate" on Form S-1, meaning they can automatically absorb subsequently filed documents into their registration statement — a meaningful paperwork reduction.
Proposal 2: filer status reform — 81% of public companies get a lighter regulatory load
The second proposal overhauls the classification system that determines how much disclosure, how many audits, and how quickly companies must file their reports. The current structure sorts public companies into five partially overlapping categories. The SEC itself describes the existing framework as complex for both companies and investors.
The proposal replaces it with two tiers:
Tier 1 — Large Accelerated Filers: The public float threshold to qualify rises from $700 million to $2 billion, and companies must have at least 60 consecutive months of public reporting history before entering this tier. The threshold also needs to be met for two consecutive years. Under these criteria, only 19.2% of public companies would be large accelerated filers, down from 35.4% today — but this group still represents 93.5% of total public market float.
Tier 2 — Non-Accelerated Filers (everyone else): All companies below the large accelerated filer threshold — 81% of public companies — would become non-accelerated filers, benefiting from nearly all disclosure scaling and accommodations currently available only to smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies. This includes no mandatory say-on-pay shareholder votes, scaled executive compensation disclosure with no pay-versus-performance reporting, reduced financial statement requirements, and — critically — no requirement to obtain an auditor's attestation on internal control over financial reporting. That last point represents a substantial cost saving for any recently listed company.
The IPO on-ramp — five years of breathing room: A newly public company would not become a large accelerated filer for at least 60 months following its IPO regardless of its public float, providing an "IPO on-ramp" to stabilise and grow while benefiting from disclosure scaling and other accommodations. For a crypto firm listing in a volatile market — exactly the situation BitGo found itself in — five years of reduced compliance overhead is a meaningful structural advantage.
The smallest companies get extra time: Companies with total assets of $35 million or less for two consecutive years would be designated as "small non-accelerated filers", representing 17.9% of all public companies. They would receive an extra 30 days to file annual Form 10-K reports and an extra five days to file quarterly Form 10-Q reports.
Why this is a digital asset story
The SEC's proposed changes could make listings cheaper and faster to execute, especially for mid-sized crypto firms that may struggle with the costs tied to becoming a public company. The barriers being removed — the WKSI float threshold, the S-3 seasoning period, state-by-state Blue Sky compliance, mandatory auditor attestation for all but the largest filers — have historically hit digital asset companies disproportionately hard.
Crypto firms tend to be younger, faster-growing, more volatile, and smaller by traditional public float metrics than the industrial-era companies the existing rules were designed for.
Chairman Atkins has underscored that the aim is not to abdicate oversight but to give crypto firms a predictable regulatory path — something he sees as enabling the U.S. to rebuild its competitive edge in blockchain innovation while still safeguarding investors. For firms like Securitize, which is actively working toward a Q2 listing, a regulatory environment that cuts IPO costs and extends post-listing flexibility could prove decisive.
What happens next
Both proposals are subject to a 60-day public comment period following publication in the Federal Register. They are proposals, not final rules — the SEC will review comments and may modify the rules before any adoption. Given the scale of the changes, pushback from audit firms, larger institutional investors, and governance advocates is likely. But the directional signal from the Commission is clear: the era of ever-expanding public company compliance costs may be coming to an end.
Morgan Stanley becomes first major U.S. bank to file spot Solana staking ETF
Morgan Stanley, one of the world’s largest financial institutions with approximately $1.8 trillion in assets under management, has amended its proposed spot Solana ETF filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to include staking functionality — a notable development in the institutionalization of digital assets.
The updated SEC filing shows the bank is seeking approval for a Solana exchange-traded fund that would not only hold SOL directly, but also generate staking rewards through participation in the Solana network. The filing was submitted through Morgan Stanley’s asset management division as part of a broader crypto ETF expansion that also includes proposed Bitcoin and Ethereum products.
What the updated filing changes
According to the amended S-1 registration statement filed with the SEC, the proposed Solana ETF may allocate a portion of its SOL holdings to approved staking providers. Any staking rewards earned would be reflected in the fund’s net asset value, effectively allowing investors to gain both price exposure and blockchain-generated yield through a regulated investment vehicle.
The filing marks an important shift in how traditional finance firms are approaching crypto investment products. Earlier spot Bitcoin ETFs approved in the United States were limited to passive exposure without yield generation. Solana, as a proof-of-stake blockchain, enables token holders to secure the network and earn rewards in return.
Industry analysts view staking-enabled ETFs as a potential next phase for institutional crypto products because they more closely resemble income-generating financial instruments familiar to traditional investors.
Morgan Stanley broadens beyond Bitcoin
The Solana amendment is part of a wider digital asset strategy from Morgan Stanley. In addition to its Solana filing, the bank has also filed for spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, signaling a broader commitment to regulated crypto investment products rather than limited exposure through third-party funds.
The move reflects growing competition among major financial institutions seeking to expand their presence in digital assets following the SEC’s approval of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. Since then, firms including BlackRock, Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, and Grayscale have accelerated filings tied to Ethereum and other blockchain ecosystems.
Institutional interest in Solana is rising
The filing also arrives amid increasing institutional demand for Solana-linked products. According to data from CoinShares cited by market reporting from MSN, Solana investment products recorded approximately $103 million in inflows during May, one of the strongest monthly totals for the asset this year.
Solana has increasingly attracted institutional attention due to its relatively fast transaction speeds, lower costs compared with Ethereum, and growing decentralized finance and tokenization ecosystem. The blockchain has also become a major platform for stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets, two areas that many traditional financial firms are actively exploring.
SEC approval still uncertain
Despite the filing update, the proposed ETF remains subject to SEC approval and no launch timeline has been announced. The regulator has not yet approved a U.S. spot crypto ETF that includes staking functionality, making Morgan Stanley’s application a closely watched case across both the crypto industry and traditional finance markets.
WHAT WE ARE READING (OR WATCHING)
The Cryptography Frontier
Fetch.ai debuts token launchpad on BNB Chain to let AI agents autonomously mint crypto
OKX's Gracie Lin Says AI Agents Need Sub-Cent Payments as Bank Rails Slow Tasks
SEC seeks public comment as it weighs prediction market ETFs
The Stablecoin Standard
Bank of England Moves Stablecoin Rules to June as UK Targets Year-End Framework
Governance Watch
The Nakamoto Engine
The Ethereum & Altcoin Atlas
Hyperliquid’s HYPE one of crypto’s most undervalued assets, says Bitwise
Lombard Adopts Chainlink CCIP as Cross-Chain Standard, Replacing LayerZero After Security Review
On the Launchpad
Charles Schwab Announces Details of Spot Crypto Trading Launch
Introducing the Maple Borrower Hub: the Operating Layer for Institutional Borrowing Onchain
The Tokenized Economy
ICE Brent and ICE WTI Perpetual Futures to Launch on OKX
The Global Pulse
Dimon Says JPMorgan Will Hire More for AI, Fewer Bankers
Beyond the Chain
Payward Secures VARA Authorization in UAE, Enabling Kraken to Expand Regional Presence
This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Please do your own research or consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
