Source: alliance bernstein
Executive Summary
This paper delves into the intricate relationship between Bitcoin and its environmental impact, aiming to demystify prevalent misconceptions while shedding light on the role Bitcoin plays in the realm of climate change.
Bitcoin, as a globally recognized digital currency and decentralized payment system, operates on a foundational principle of cryptographic peer-to-peer transactions. Its distinctive feature, the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism, has sparked substantial controversy due to its energy consumption. Criticism often compares this energy usage to that of entire nations such as Denmark or Sweden, prompting concerns about sustainability and ecological repercussions.
The Proof of Work process involves solving complex mathematical problems through computational processes, known as hashing, to validate and add transactions to the blockchain. This energy-intensive method, while essential for securing the network and preventing double spending, has drawn attention to the environmental implications of Bitcoin mining.
Contrary to emitting direct emissions, akin to electric vehicles, Bitcoin’s environmental impact is primarily rooted in the indirect emissions associated with the energy sources powering the mining hardware (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits — ASICs). The energy required to power Bitcoin mining remains a focal point in ongoing discussions about its environmental implications. This discussion delves into the energy sources and the overall environmental impact of the process.
This article will thoroughly explore these aspects, evaluating the environmental footprint of Bitcoin, addressing prevailing misconceptions, and illuminating how Bitcoin contributes to and could potentially lead to beneficial changes in the landscape of climate change.
What is the Energy Consumption of Bitcoin?
Source: KPMG
As of the latest data available, it’s estimated that Bitcoin consumes an approximate 110 terawatt hours of energy annually. This substantial figure represents roughly 0.55% of the global electricity consumption (KPMG, 2023). The colossal energy demand stems primarily from the energy-intensive process of Bitcoin mining, a vital component in verifying transactions and maintaining the security of the decentralized network.
Of particular interest and significance is the evolution in the ecological profile of Bitcoin mining. In the first quarter of 2021, only about 34% of Bitcoin mining was categorized as renewable energy, suggesting that a substantial portion of the mining process relied on energy sources with notable environmental footprints. However, the latest insights from the Bitcoin Mining Council in 2023 shed a positive light on the trajectory of Bitcoin’s environmental impact. The data reveals a remarkable surge, indicating that approximately 59.9% of Bitcoin mining is now deemed as renewable.
The shift toward a more sustainable energy profile within Bitcoin mining marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding its environmental impact. However, while the statistics highlight a promising trend towards increased clean energy usage, it’s crucial to delve deeper into the multifaceted nature of Bitcoin’s energy consumption.
In the upcoming sections, we will explore compelling case studies and examine reasons that contribute to the evolving landscape of Bitcoin’s energy usage. These case studies will not only shed light on the advancements but also serve to debunk prevalent myths and misconceptions. By dissecting the practical applications, initiatives, and debunking prevalent notions, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic interplay between Bitcoin’s energy consumption and its environmental implications. Through an analytical lens, we will navigate through the complexities and opportunities, offering a balanced perspective on the actual environmental impact of Bitcoin in today’s ever-changing global energy landscape.
Even Per Transaction, Bitcoin Remains More Efficient Than Traditional Financial System
Source: pixabay
In a recent academic research paper titled “Bitcoin: Cryptopayments Energy Efficiency” by M. Khazzaka (2022), a comprehensive comparison between Bitcoin’s energy costs for transactions and those of traditional financial systems revealed an illuminating reality.
The findings from this study are striking. The research asserts that, when evaluating the energy efficiency of Bitcoin’s Proof of Work (PoW) protocol in comparison to the energy expenditures in classical monetary and payments systems, Bitcoin consumes at least 28 times less energy per transaction. Furthermore, when considering overall transaction volumes, Bitcoin operates today using 60 times less energy than traditional financial systems.
The paper importantly highlights that many previous evaluations failed to compare Bitcoin’s PoW energy efficiency with different elements of the conventional monetary and payments system. The correct evaluation of Bitcoin functions, along with their energy consumption in comparison to their counterparts in traditional electronic cash and payment systems, was an essential aspect missing in prior analyses.
Specifically, the paper’s scientific approach accounts for various energy components within traditional financial systems, such as the energy used in printing and minting cash, ATMs, cash transportation, EPOS terminals, card payments, banking offices, commute, and IT-related expenses, as well as inter-banking energy consumption. This meticulous consideration allows for a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the energy efficiency differences between Bitcoin and the conventional financial ecosystem.
The research fundamentally challenges prevailing perceptions, demonstrating Bitcoin’s remarkable efficiency and scalability compared to traditional financial systems. It underlines Bitcoin’s energy efficiency as a pivotal force that has the potential to significantly transform the landscape of financial transactions. Moreover, when comparing Bitcoin’s Lightning network with the instant payment systems, the research highlights the considerable gains in scalability and efficiency, revealing Bitcoin as millions of times more energy-efficient per transaction than instant payments.
Bitcoin Miners: Supporting Grid Stability and the Case of Winter Storm Uri
Bitcoin mining operations possess a unique and valuable attribute: the ability to swiftly adapt their energy consumption to aid in grid stabilization, ensuring a balance during periods of heightened demand.
Miners contribute to grid stability by participating in demand response programs, offering a flexible load capacity. This flexibility enables them to curtail their power usage immediately, providing excess power to the grid when demand surpasses available supply.
During Winter Storm Uri, a severe weather event that struck Texas in February 2021, plunging temperatures to as low as -14 degrees, Bitcoin miners in the region played a significant role. Their ability to swiftly reduce energy consumption allowed for approximately 1,500 megawatts to be reallocated to the grid. This action significantly supported the energy demands during the crisis, providing much-needed additional power amidst the challenging weather conditions.
The case of Winter Storm Uri in Texas stands as a concrete example of Bitcoin miners’ capacity to swiftly curtail their energy consumption, offering essential support to the grid during times of heightened demand. This adaptability showcases the potential for Bitcoin mining operations to serve as a responsive and responsible contributor to overall grid stability.
Bitcoin Mining: Incentivizing Renewable Energy
Source: pixabay
The competition within Bitcoin mining pools across the globe, sharing block rewards relative to their computing power, has created an environment where efficiency and cost management are paramount. As electricity constitutes a major operational cost, miners are driven to seek the most economical power sources, often found in underutilized renewable energy such as hydro, wind, or solar.
However, renewable sources like wind and solar possess inherent limitations due to their intermittency and variable outputs. They often generate surplus energy at certain times, leading to an oversupply and potentially reduced market prices. Bitcoin miners, adaptable in their operations, have the flexibility to establish themselves near these renewable energy sites, synchronizing their load to complement supply and demand patterns.
This adaptability provides an exceptional advantage: Bitcoin miners can dynamically adjust their power consumption during surplus energy periods or when market demand is low. By doing so, they create added impetus for the expansion of renewable energy capacity. These miners effectively serve as non-core load centers, enhancing the economic viability of renewable energy projects and encouraging further development in the sector.
Former CEO of ERCOT, organization that operates Texas’s electrical grid, Brad Jones, emphasized that Bitcoin mining supports renewable energy markets by enabling these sources to continue generating revenue during times of surplus energy, preventing shutdowns or scenarios where customers are paid to use excess power.
Texas, a hub for renewable energy, produced an impressive 136,000 gigawatt hours of wind and solar energy in 2022, fostering an environment conducive to Bitcoin mining. A staggering 59% of the total Bitcoin hash rate in the United States is generated in Texas due to its abundance of renewable energy sources (KPMG, 2023).
The World Economic Forum highlighted the role of Bitcoin mining as a market driver for new renewable energy projects, particularly in remote areas where the demand might not support large-scale renewable sites (WEF, 2022). This underscores Bitcoin’s potential to serve as a catalyst for the integration of renewable energy into the grid.
Bitcoin Mining’s Role in Methane Emission Reduction: A Case Study of Marathon Digital Holdings
Source: commons.wikimedia
Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, significantly contributes to global warming, emitted from various sources including coal mines, landfills, and oil/gas extraction. While methane is 80 times more potent than CO2 over a 20-year period (UNEP, 2022), innovative approaches within the Bitcoin mining industry offer a promising solution to mitigate its impact on the environment.
A study revealed that capturing flared gas in the US and Canada alone could power the entire Bitcoin network (Harvard Business Review, 2021).
The case of Marathon Digital Holdings, a leading figure in the Bitcoin ecosystem, illustrates an impactful initiative. Through a partnership with Nodal Power, Marathon operates a 280 kW Bitcoin mining pilot project in Utah, solely powered by landfill methane gas. This pilot aims to capture methane emitted from landfills, converting it into electricity to power Bitcoin miners, potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions while using a renewable, off-grid energy source.
Fred Thiel, Chairman, and CEO of Marathon, highlighted the significance of this approach, aiming to simultaneously diversify operations, reduce energy costs, and leverage Bitcoin mining to positively impact the environment. He emphasized that Bitcoin miners, like Marathon, can play a unique role in converting stranded harmful gases into clean, renewable energy, potentially aiding landfill operators in meeting environmental targets.
However, certain questions arise in this context. Foremost among these is the query as to why this harnessed energy can’t be redirected to power hospitals or homes. The primary obstacle lies in the considerable distance between the flare stacks and the primary electricity grids. These stacks are typically situated far from the main grids, making it economically unfeasible to construct power lines connecting them. Consequently, the captured heat and methane, valuable sources of potential energy, have traditionally been wasted, expelled as air pollution.
This case study exemplifies how Bitcoin mining operations, through innovative partnerships and strategies, contribute to reducing methane emissions. By harnessing stranded gases from landfills and converting them into a productive energy source, Bitcoin miners are fostering a more sustainable and environmentally conscious future.
Moreover, companies like Crusoe Energy, specializing in modular data centers powered by stranded natural gas, are partnering with oil and gas entities, such as Exxon, to convert flared gas into electricity for Bitcoin mining.
The World Bank’s recent report titled “Financing Solutions to Reduce Natural Gas Flaring and Methane Emissions” recognizes and acknowledges the positive environmental influence attributed to Bitcoin mining concerning gas flaring. The report underlines the beneficial role of Bitcoin mining in reducing natural gas flaring and methane emissions.
Bitcoin Mining: Empowering Rural Africa — A Case Study
Source: The Economist (2019)
In addressing the pressing energy crisis in Africa, especially in remote regions where conventional grid access is a significant challenge, the potential for Bitcoin miners to revolutionize the energy landscape becomes apparent. Notably, the International Energy Agency reports that approximately 600 million people in Africa lack access to electricity, with limited prospects for grid expansion due to the exorbitant costs associated with infrastructure development in remote areas.
A study by the World Bank emphasizes the urgent need for a substantial expansion of mini-grids in Africa. The task demands a monumental increase from 3,100 mini-grids in 2021 to 160,000 by 2030, an increase of over 50 times in a span of nine years. However, at the current rate of development, only about 44,800 mini-grids are projected to be installed by 2030, serving merely around 80 million people in Africa.
A significant challenge in the electrification of these underserved regions involves the economic intricacies of renewable energy-powered mini-grids. These systems typically range from 20kW to 1MW, specifically designed to suit the needs of the respective communities. However, the demand for electricity peaks between 6 and 9 pm in rural areas, coinciding with the sunset. Consequently, there is a necessity for an “overbuilt” grid to manage this critical period, leading to high initial costs and a prolonged waiting period for businesses to join the grid and contribute financially, which dissuades potential commercial investors.
However, an unconventional and promising strategy, presently implemented by Gridless Compute in East Africa, delves into utilizing Bitcoin mining operations. Bitcoin mines rely heavily on power to function, and their profitability is intricately linked to the cost of electricity. Interestingly, the power required for these operations can be sourced from untapped renewable sources, effectively at a minimal cost.
The inherent profitability of even small-scale Bitcoin mining operations, primarily due to the comparatively minimal cost of electricity compared to other operational expenses, can fund renewable mini-grids and supply power to the community at no extra charge. Furthermore, Bitcoin mines offer a unique advantage in their ability to modulate power consumption, thereby serving as effective load balancers during peak demand periods.
Unlike conventional energy consumers that rely on a market for their power and are usually situated near population centers, Bitcoin mines possess the flexibility to operate in remote areas. This distinctive feature allows them to utilize untapped energy resources for operations and revenue generation without the constraints of urban dependence.
This unconventional fusion of Bitcoin mining with renewable energy for community power supply heralds a significant paradigm shift. Notably, these mining operations can swiftly establish themselves with fewer regulatory obstacles compared to larger renewable energy initiatives that often contribute to national grids.
Contrary to the negative attention received for their energy consumption, Bitcoin mines may actually serve as a crucial part of the solution to provide energy to rural, marginalized, and energy-deprived communities. The burgeoning interest in Bitcoin mining projects in countries such as Kenya and Malawi, indicates a growing enthusiasm for this innovative approach, underscoring its immense potential in addressing the energy needs of remote African communities.
Summary
In summary, this exploration of Bitcoin’s environmental impact and energy consumption unveils a nuanced relationship between the cryptocurrency and ecological concerns. It clarifies misconceptions and highlights the multifaceted role Bitcoin plays in addressing climate change.
By comparing Bitcoin’s energy efficiency with traditional financial systems, this analysis underscores the notable efficiency of Bitcoin transactions. The meticulous evaluation in this study, often lacking in previous assessments, fills a critical void in accurately comparing Bitcoin’s energy consumption with elements of conventional financial systems.
Furthermore, the shift towards renewable energy sources in Bitcoin mining marks a pivotal moment, signifying a substantial improvement in the sustainability of Bitcoin’s energy usage. Case studies demonstrate the diverse positive impacts of Bitcoin mining, showcasing its contribution to grid stability, incentivization of renewable energy, reduction of methane emissions, and potential for providing energy to underserved communities in remote regions.
The innovative initiatives within the Bitcoin ecosystem, seen in projects across different sectors and geographies, hint at a promising future where Bitcoin mining operations could significantly contribute to environmental sustainability. These examples illustrate the adaptability and flexibility of Bitcoin mining in driving innovative solutions for a more sustainable energy landscape.
This dynamic interplay between Bitcoin and environmental concerns underscores the need for continued research, collaboration, and exploration. Understanding and leveraging the potential of Bitcoin in energy efficiency and environmental impact can pave the way for a future where cryptocurrency and environmental responsibility coexist harmoniously.
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by Wheatstones, and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
References:
Baur, Dirk G. (2023). “Bitcoin: Cryptopayments Energy Efficiency.” [SSRN Working Paper]. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125499
Bitcoin Mining Council (2023). “Bitcoin Mining Council H1 2023 Presentation.” [Bitcoin Mining Council Report]. [Online]. Available: https://bitcoinminingcouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/BMC-H1-2023-Presentation.pdf
The Economist. (2019). More than half of sub-Saharan Africans lack access to electricity. The Economist — Graphic Detail. [Online]. Available: https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/11/13/more-than-half-of-sub-saharan-africans-lack-access-to-electricity
HBR (2021). “How Much Energy Does Bitcoin Actually Consume?” [Harvard Business Review Article]. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2021/05/how-much-energy-does-bitcoin-actually-consume#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20Cambridge%20Center,like%20a%20lot%20of%20energy.
KPMG (2023). “Bitcoin’s Role in the ESG Imperative.” [KPMG Report]. [Online]. Available: https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2023/bitcoins-role-esg-imperative.pdf
Mara Digital Holdings (2023). “Marathon Digital Holdings Announces Energization of Its…” [Marathon Digital Holdings Press Release]. [Online]. Available: https://ir.mara.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1330/marathon-digital-holdings-announces-energization-of-its#:~:text=Marathon's%20pilot%20project%20is%20part,electricity%20to%20power%20Bitcoin%20miners
United Nations Environment Programme (2022). “What’s the Deal with Methane?”. [Online]. Available: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/video/whats-deal-methane#:~:text=Due%20to%20its%20structure%2C%20methane,warming%20to%201.5%C2%B0C.
World Bank (2023). “Solar Mini-Grids Could Sustainably Power 380 Million People in Africa by 2030 if Action is Taken Now.” [World Bank Press Release]. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/02/26/solar-mini-grids-could-sustainably-power-380-million-people-in-afe-africa-by-2030-if-action-is-taken-now
World Bank (2023). Financing Solutions to Reduce Natural Gas Flaring and Methane Emissions. Gas Flaring Reduction Program. [Online]. Available: [https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/gasflaringreduction/publication/financing-solutions-to-reduce-natural-gas-flaring-and-methane-emissions]
World Economic Forum (2022). “Cleaning up Cryptocurrency Mining.” [World Economic Forum Article]. [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/08/cleaning-up-cryptocurrency-mining/